Skip to Content

Resource hub

An independent quality assurance of evidence assessments undertaken by JNCC for possible Tranche 2 rMCZs 2014

Marine JNCC Publications Seabed Habitats and Geology 0963-8091 Evidence JNCC report series Marine Marine conservation zone Marine Habitat Mapping Marine Habitats Marine protected area Monitoring Surveillance and Monitoring 519

Abstract

To support the UK Government’s designation of Marine Conservation Zones, JNCC is responsible for assessing the evidence underpinning offshore MCZ features of interest (i.e. species of conservation importance, habitats of conservation importance, broad-scale habitats and geological/geomorphological features).

At the request of the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), JNCC and Natural England produced Technical Protocol E and accompanying guidance, which set out the broad principles and approach for assessing the evidence underpinning features within MCZs and recommended MCZs (rMCZ). The assessment considers evidence from multiple sources and is used to determine the confidence in the evidence supporting the presence and spatial extent of features.

In response to recent developments in JNCC’s policy relating to the Quality Assurance (QA) of evidence, JNCC has introduced a further QA step into its MCZ work by commissioning an independent audit of the application of Protocol E to features in offshore rMCZ. The Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Studies (IECS, University of Hull) was commissioned by JNCC to undertake this independent audit of the application of Protocol E. Three rMCZs were selected independently by IECS staff for analysis. These sites contained examples for all four feature types (including a geological/geomorphology feature).

Several features were subject to expert judgement for the final confidence assessment. It was apparent that Protocol E had been rigorously and consistently applied to all features and between rMCZs. Where expert judgement had been applied, it resulted in a more accurate assessment of confidence and was firmly in the spirit of Protocol E. Although the reasoning for the use of expert judgement was clearly stated during the audit, it was found that supporting narratives and annotation attached to the evidence list often lacked sufficient detail to convey this as a stand-alone description.

Resource type Publication

Topic category Environment

Reference date 2014·11·01

Citation
Asa Strong, J., Burdon, D. & Elliott, M. 2014. An independent Quality Assurance of JNCC’s evidence assessments for possible Tranche 2 rMCZs. JNCC Report No 519. JNCC, Peterborough, ISSN 0963-8091.

Lineage
The overall aim of this project was for an independent scientist to undertake a quality assurance audit of how the biophysical evidence underpinning each feature gave rise to the JNCC’s confidence assessments, based on the approaches outlined in Protocol E and the associated guidance document.

Responsible organisation
Communications, JNCC publisher

Limitations on public access No limitations

Use constraints Available under the Open Government Licence 3.0

Metadata date 2019·12·13

Metadata point of contact
Communications, JNCC

Back to top