Official statistic on wintering waterbird population trends
This page hosts the Official Statistic ‘Population trends for waterbirds in the UK’ published on 16 April 2026, including data up to June 2025.
Contents
- Official Statistic description
- Scope of the statistic
- Summary of results
- Interpretation of results
- Confidence in results, quality assurance and caveats
- Drivers of change
- Background and Methods
- Involvement and contacts
- Relation to other Official and National Statistics, and broader relevance
- References
Official Statistic description
UK and country trends produced from the data from the Wetland Bird Survey (WeBS) and Goose and Swan Monitoring Programme (GSMP) are published annually as an Official Statistic.
The Official Statistic on waterbird trends generated from these two monitoring schemes is first published on JNCC’s website. The Statistic is also incorporated into the WeBS Annual Report titled Waterbirds in the UK; and further site-specific information and trends for these and other species that do not feature in the Official Statistic can be accessed via WeBS Report Online.
WeBS is the principal scheme for monitoring the populations of the UK’s non-breeding waterbird populations, providing an important indicator of their status and of the health of wetlands. The monitoring scheme aims to assess the size of non-breeding waterbird populations, determine trends in numbers and distribution of wintering birds, and assess the importance of individual sites, in line with the requirements of international conservation conventions and directives. Data have been collected annually since 1947 for wildfowl, since 1969 for waders and since the 1980s or 1990s for other species. GSMP surveys contribute trends for six goose species/populations, where standard WeBS methodology is not adequate, for instance where the main roosts are located outside of the WeBS sites and/or the count needs to be carried out at a different time of the day.
Scope of the statistic
Population trends for the 52 species and populations of waterbirds wintering in the UK presented here are published as an Official Statistic. This 2026 Statistic includes data up to the end of the 2024/25 non-breeding season.
Annual indices and smoothed indices (a measure of population abundance) are calculated to generate the 25-year trends and 10-year trends for these species in the UK and by constituent country. Further detail on these and other species can be accessed via WeBS Report Online.
Summary of results
Population trends are published as an Official Statistic for 52 of the species and populations of waterbirds monitored in the UK by WeBS and GSMP. The data tables that accompany this release are available in spreadsheet format. These represent the most numerous of the species monitored, with trends that are considered robust enough to meet the stringent quality criteria to be published as an Official Statistic. These include 43 species of native waterbirds, of which four are goose species for which populations originating from separate parts of their breeding range can be distinguished and are monitored separately, resulting in 48 separate trends. In addition, the monitoring covers four non-native species – Canada Goose, Barnacle Goose (naturalised population), Egyptian Goose and Mandarin Duck – now established in the UK in large enough numbers to allow production of a robust trend.
Table 1 below presents the 25-year and 10-year trends for the 52 species and populations at UK level, and Table 2 presents the trends in England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Unless specified, the interpretive text below refers to UK trends and indices. Country trends are discussed where they add to the narrative, and are clearly indicated.
|
Species/population |
25-year trend |
10-year trend |
Species/population |
25-year trend |
10-year trend |
|
|
Dark-bellied Brent Goose |
-2 |
-12 |
Scaup |
-73 |
-57 |
|
|
Svalbard Light-b. Brent Goose |
52 |
13 |
Eider |
-32 |
-20 |
|
|
Nearctic Light-b. Brent Goose |
36 |
-2 |
Goldeneye |
-56 |
-20 |
|
|
Canada Goose |
60 |
27 |
Goosander |
-23 |
-7 |
|
|
Naturalised Barnacle Goose |
178 |
9 |
Red-breasted Merganser |
-46 |
-21 |
|
|
Greenland Barnacle Goose |
31 |
-22 |
Little Grebe |
24 |
11 |
|
|
Svalbard Barnacle Goose |
68 |
8 |
Great Crested Grebe |
-26 |
-9 |
|
|
British/Irish Greylag Goose |
120 |
19 |
Little Egret |
573 |
44 |
|
|
Icelandic Greylag Goose |
-30 |
-44 |
Cormorant |
46 |
23 |
|
|
Pink-footed Goose |
96 |
19 |
Moorhen |
-25 |
-14 |
|
|
Greenland White-fronted Goose |
-57 |
-10 |
Coot |
-30 |
-18 |
|
|
European White-fronted Goose |
-67 |
-13 |
Oystercatcher |
-19 |
-1 |
|
|
Mute Swan |
-6 |
-6 |
Avocet |
174 |
35 |
|
|
Bewick's Swan |
-96 |
-88 |
Lapwing |
-41 |
-12 |
|
|
Whooper Swan |
171 |
25 |
Golden Plover |
-26 |
-17 |
|
|
Egyptian Goose |
577 |
120 |
Grey Plover |
-30 |
-1 |
|
|
Shelduck |
-20 |
9 |
Ringed Plover |
-41 |
7 |
|
|
Mandarin Duck |
129 |
30 |
Curlew |
-41 |
-24 |
|
|
Shoveler |
82 |
44 |
Bar-tailed Godwit |
-28 |
-22 |
|
|
Gadwall |
51 |
9 |
Black-tailed Godwit |
145 |
22 |
|
|
Wigeon |
-6 |
-6 |
Turnstone |
-17 |
3 |
|
|
Mallard |
-32 |
-16 |
Knot |
15 |
3 |
|
|
Pintail |
-6 |
39 |
Sanderling |
54 |
25 |
|
|
Teal |
14 |
-2 |
Dunlin |
-22 |
16 |
|
|
Pochard |
-72 |
-33 |
Purple Sandpiper |
-14 |
22 |
|
|
Tufted Duck |
-21 |
-22 |
Redshank |
-24 |
0 |
|
|
Table 1 footnotes: Trends are % changes of smoothed population index values for the 52 most abundant waterbird species and populations in the UK for which a robust trend can be produced. The 25-year smoothed trend refers to the 25-year period 1998/99 to 2023/24. The 10-year smoothed trend refers to the 10-year period 2013/14 to 2023/24. Note, it is customary to truncate the final year when reporting smoothed trends, so whilst data from 2024/25 have been used in creating the smoothed index values, the trend period assessed and reported is until 2023/24. Trends use WeBS data except for Pink-footed Goose, Greenland White-fronted Goose, Icelandic Greylag Goose, Greenland Barnacle Goose and Svalbard Barnacle Goose, for which dedicated censuses are undertaken by GSMP. The Icelandic-breeding Goose census that contribute the data for Pink-footed Goose and Icelandic Greylag Goose, include birds residing in other countries at the time of the census, mostly birds still in Iceland in late autumn which come to the UK later in the winter. |
||||||
|
Species/population |
England |
Wales |
Scotland |
Northern Ireland |
||||
|
25-year trend |
10-year trend |
25-year trend |
10-year trend |
25-year trend |
10-year trend |
25-year trend |
10-year trend |
|
|
Dark-bellied Brent Goose |
-2 |
-12 |
-54 |
-42 |
na |
na |
na |
na |
|
Svalbard Light-b. Brent Goose |
50 |
13 |
na |
na |
522 |
15 |
na |
na |
|
Nearctic Light-b. Brent Goose |
4400 |
84 |
2200 |
80 |
1388 |
164 |
20 |
-8 |
|
Canada Goose |
49 |
28 |
140 |
35 |
375 |
30 |
-44 |
-45 |
|
Naturalised Barnacle Goose |
181 |
6 |
3900 |
26 |
na |
na |
121 |
19 |
|
Greenland Barnacle Goose |
na |
na |
na |
na |
31 |
-22 |
na |
na |
|
Svalbard Barnacle Goose |
68 |
8 |
na |
na |
54 |
-1 |
na |
na |
|
British/Irish Greylag Goose |
110 |
17 |
12 |
28 |
229 |
62 |
na |
-12 |
|
Icelandic Greylag Goose |
na |
na |
na |
na |
-30 |
-44 |
na |
na |
|
Pink-footed Goose |
98 |
21 |
na |
na |
90 |
0 |
na |
na |
|
Greenland White-fronted Goose |
na |
na |
na |
-23 |
-57 |
-10 |
na |
na |
|
European White-fronted Goose |
-74 |
-10 |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
|
Mute Swan |
0 |
-5 |
21 |
-16 |
-10 |
-10 |
-42 |
15 |
|
Bewick's Swan |
-95 |
-86 |
-100 |
-100 |
na |
na |
-100 |
-100 |
|
Whooper Swan |
225 |
28 |
157 |
-31 |
25 |
-21 |
65 |
2 |
|
Egyptian Goose |
577 |
120 |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
|
Shelduck |
-17 |
17 |
-19 |
4 |
-22 |
-11 |
-27 |
-13 |
|
Mandarin Duck |
102 |
27 |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
|
Shoveler |
98 |
49 |
-22 |
-22 |
-43 |
-4 |
-30 |
-4 |
|
Gadwall |
46 |
7 |
130 |
0 |
166 |
103 |
68 |
51 |
|
Wigeon |
-2 |
-5 |
2 |
4 |
-13 |
0 |
-55 |
-17 |
|
Mallard |
-30 |
-18 |
-24 |
-1 |
-38 |
-6 |
-32 |
-20 |
|
Pintail |
-13 |
38 |
-18 |
8 |
22 |
35 |
61 |
2 |
|
Teal |
18 |
-5 |
-5 |
5 |
-4 |
3 |
26 |
-3 |
|
Pochard |
-62 |
-22 |
-90 |
-55 |
-79 |
-42 |
-90 |
-67 |
|
Tufted Duck |
2 |
-16 |
15 |
-16 |
-25 |
-28 |
-79 |
-46 |
|
Scaup |
-92 |
-86 |
-74 |
-22 |
-60 |
-50 |
-85 |
-73 |
|
Eider |
-44 |
-14 |
-20 |
51 |
-38 |
-24 |
100 |
-4 |
|
Goldeneye |
-43 |
-19 |
-61 |
-39 |
-34 |
-12 |
-90 |
-58 |
|
Goosander |
-28 |
-2 |
98 |
46 |
-18 |
-18 |
na |
na |
|
Red-breasted Merganser |
-57 |
-40 |
-64 |
-33 |
-34 |
-5 |
-21 |
19 |
|
Little Grebe |
17 |
3 |
25 |
-4 |
84 |
30 |
19 |
54 |
|
Great Crested Grebe |
-17 |
-13 |
-3 |
-14 |
-46 |
-16 |
-54 |
73 |
|
Little Egret |
500 |
32 |
827 |
79 |
na |
833 |
na |
322 |
|
Cormorant |
64 |
24 |
27 |
-5 |
-21 |
9 |
-12 |
16 |
|
Moorhen |
-29 |
-19 |
-13 |
18 |
3 |
28 |
-35 |
9 |
|
Coot |
-27 |
-19 |
-36 |
-14 |
-49 |
-24 |
-47 |
11 |
|
Oystercatcher |
-18 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
-40 |
-18 |
-40 |
-22 |
|
Avocet |
194 |
41 |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
na |
|
Lapwing |
-38 |
-11 |
-10 |
-34 |
-70 |
-18 |
-66 |
-26 |
|
Golden Plover |
-18 |
-15 |
111 |
-11 |
-36 |
-3 |
-66 |
-28 |
|
Grey Plover |
-28 |
0 |
-47 |
-27 |
-72 |
-39 |
-61 |
44 |
|
Ringed Plover |
-46 |
0 |
-21 |
11 |
-37 |
-4 |
-19 |
18 |
|
Curlew |
-39 |
-25 |
-38 |
-18 |
-45 |
-25 |
-52 |
-30 |
|
Bar-tailed Godwit |
-22 |
-18 |
-39 |
-34 |
-49 |
-31 |
-58 |
-49 |
|
Black-tailed Godwit |
131 |
21 |
220 |
33 |
367 |
172 |
556 |
22 |
|
Turnstone |
-13 |
6 |
40 |
38 |
-27 |
-4 |
-26 |
-13 |
|
Knot |
22 |
4 |
3 |
-40 |
-53 |
-28 |
-36 |
74 |
|
Sanderling |
52 |
25 |
14 |
-9 |
102 |
13 |
1800 |
111 |
|
Dunlin |
-18 |
16 |
-45 |
-12 |
-28 |
40 |
-37 |
48 |
|
Purple Sandpiper |
-26 |
14 |
na |
na |
17 |
22 |
-59 |
41 |
|
Redshank |
-18 |
-2 |
19 |
-1 |
-32 |
3 |
-41 |
1 |
|
Table 2 footnotes: Trends are % changes of smoothed population index values for the most abundant waterbirds in the UK constituent countries for which robust trends can be produced; note that numbers in some countries may be small. na = inadequate data or species not present in that country The 25-year smoothed trend refers to the 25-year period 1998/99 to 2023/24. The 10-year smoothed trend refers to the 10-year period 2013/14 to 2023/24. Note, it is customary to truncate the final year when reporting smoothed trends, so whilst data from 2024/25 have been used in creating the smoothed index values, the trend period assessed and reported is until 2023/24. Trends use WeBS data except for Pink-footed Goose, Greenland White-fronted Goose, Icelandic Greylag Goose, Greenland Barnacle Goose and Svalbard Barnacle Goose, for which dedicated censuses are undertaken |
||||||||
Geese and Swans
Having peaked in 2011/12, the trends for the Icelandic population of Greylag Goose suggest a continued apparent decline, with the latest index the lowest since 1965/66. However, this trend needs to be treated with caution due to the increase in the British/Irish population into areas traditionally used by Icelandic birds in winter, which is making an accurate estimate increasingly more difficult. Research into this is ongoing. The numbers of Pink-footed Goose, which also breeds in Iceland, have increased steadily since monitoring started in 1960/61. This increase appears to be slowing down, with a 10-year trend of +19%, down from +33% a year ago.
Both populations of the White-fronted Goose continue to decline, with the index for the Greenland population of the White-fronted Goose at its lowest since 1983/84. Having been affected by HPAI outbreaks in 2021/22 and 2022/23, Svalbard Barnacle Geese appear to have bounced back. The population index is in line with those recorded pre-HPAI outbreak, suggesting that HPAI is no longer depressing the population. Greenland Barnacle Goose was impacted by HPAI in 2022/23 and 2023/24, resulting in a sizeable drop in the population.
Trends for British Greylag Goose and the non-native Canada Goose continue to show increases, although the 10-year trends, +19% and +27% respectively, are slightly lower than the previous year. Another non-native species, Egyptian Goose, attained another record high index with a 10-year trend of +120%. The second consecutive year of lower indices for naturalised Barnacle Goose has reduced the 10-year trend to +9%.
Nearctic Light-bellied Brent Goose attained record high indices in England and Wales, and in Scotland the 10-year trend is still strongly positive at +164% despite a drop in the latest year’s index. The Northern Ireland population has fluctuated with a 10-year trend of -8%. Because the vast majority of the Nearctic population winters in Northern Ireland, the population overall is considered stable with a UK 10-year trend of -2%. The other two Brent Goose populations have contrasting trajectories. While the Svalbard Light-bellied Brent Goose 10-year trend is +13%, Dark-bellied Brent Goose continues to decline with a 10-year trend of -12%.
The index value for Bewick’s Swan is the lowest on record. Its wintering range is now almost entirely restricted to England with a 25-year trend of -96% and 10-year trend of -88%. In contrast, Whooper Swans continue to increase, particularly in England. Mute Swan is experiencing a slight population decline overall with UK 25-year and 10-year trends both at -6%. Regional differences are highlighted by the lowest index in England and in Wales since the late 1990s, while Northern Ireland recorded a positive 10-year trend.
Ducks
Dabbling ducks continue to exhibit variable trends. Shoveler continues to increase with a record high UK index (25-year trend of +82%, 10-year trend of +44%). This mirrors the trend and the record high index in England. In contrast, the populations in Scotland and Northern Ireland are fairly stable, whilst the index in Wales was the lowest since 1994/95 (10-year trend of -22%). Gadwall continued to increase (25-year trend of +51%) with a record high index in Scotland for the third consecutive year. Shelduck remains fairly stable overall (10-year trend of +9%), although a large drop in Northern Ireland this year has resulted in a record low index there. Teal and Wigeon numbers continue to be relatively stable, while Mallard continues to decline.
Diving ducks continued to show marked declines in both 25- and 10-year trends. Both Eider and Scaup have a record low index and UK 10-year trends of -20% and -57% respectively. Tufted Duck index is the lowest since 1985/86 with a UK 10-year trend of -22%. Goldeneye has the lowest index since 1969/70 and a UK 10-year trend of -20%. Pochard continues to decline across the UK (10-year trend of -33%). All of these three species recorded a record low index in Northern Ireland.
Both sawbill species, Goosander and Red-breasted Merganser, have declined with 25-year trends of -23% and -46% respectively. However, Goosander continues to increase in Wales, where the 25-year trend of +98% and 10-year trend of +46% are reflected in the record high index, while in England the 10-year trend is stable. Both the 10-year and 25-year trends in Scotland (-18%) indicate a decline, although this is largely disguised in the large between-year fluctuations that leave the interpretation open for a broadly stable trend. Red-breasted Merganser continues to decline across the UK with the lowest index in England since 1971/72 and in Wales since 1968/69.
Waders
Avocet, Black-tailed Godwit and Sanderling are the only common wintering wader species with clear long-term increases in the UK. Black-tailed Godwit 10-year trend is +22% and it attained its highest index on record for UK and in Wales. Avocet and sanderling continue to increase with 10-year trends of +35% and +25% respectively, although the index is somewhat down from the previous year’s record highs.
Curlew declines continue (25-year trend of -41% and 10-year trend of -24%) with a record low index in England and Northern Ireland. Bar-tailed Godwit, Lapwing and Golden Plover all continue to decline with 10-year trends of -22%, -12% and -17% respectively. Bar-tailed Godwit had its lowest index on record in Scotland and Northern Ireland.
A number of wader species in long-term decline have stabilised or increased in recent years, most notably Purple Sandpiper (overall 10-year trend +22%), and Dunlin which has an overall positive 10-year trend of +16% despite a record low in Northern Ireland. There is an overall stable 10-year trend also for Turnstone (+3%), Redshank (0%), Ringed Plover (+7%) and Grey Plover (-1%), even though the Redshank index in Northern Ireland and Grey Plover index in Scotland were record lows, and Ringed Plover had its lowest index in Scotland since 1981/82.
Oystercatcher trend is stable overall (10-year trend of -1%). Regional variations in Knot trends continue, including a strong short-term increase in Northern Ireland (10-year trend of +74%) and record low index in Scotland contrasting against a stable UK trend of +3%.
Other waterbirds
Little Egret population growth continues with a 10-year trend of +44% and record high index in Scotland. In contrast, Moorhen (10-year trend of -14%) and Coot (10-year trend of -18%) continue to decline.
Notable population changes
The four non-native species continue to increase in numbers and expand in range in the UK, and as a result show large population increases in both 25-year and 10-year trends. While the rate of increase in Canada Goose (+60% and +27%), naturalised Barnacle Goose (+178% and +9%) and Mandarin Duck (+129% and +30%) appears to be slightly lower than before, the rate of increase for Egyptian Goose shows signs of potentially accelerating (+577% and +120%).
Largest UK population changes for native species were:
- 25-year increases: Little Egret +573%, Avocet +174%, Whooper Swan +171%, Black-tailed Godwit +145%, British/Irish Greylag Goose +120%, Pink-footed Goose +96%.
- 10-year increases: Little Egret +44%, Shoveler +44%, Pintail +39%, Avocet +35%, Sanderling +25%, Whooper Swan +25%
- 25-year declines: Bewick’s Swan -96%, Scaup -73%, Pochard -72%, European White-fronted Goose -67%, Greenland White-fronted Goose -57%, Goldeneye -56%, Red-breasted Merganser -46%, Lapwing -41%, Ringed Plover -41%, Curlew -41%
- 10-year declines: Bewick’s Swan -88%, Scaup -57%, Icelandic Greylag Goose -44%, Pochard -33%, Curlew -24%
Interpretation of results
WeBS reporting, including data from GSMP, provides, in one place, information that can be used to understand the status and trends of key populations of waterbirds, thereby contributing to international reporting commitments, to national-level policy and management, and to scientific research.
The UK is an important wintering area for waterbirds due to its climate, large number of estuarine feeding grounds, and position on bird migration routes. As a result, an internationally important proportion of the world population of many waterbird species or subspecies occur in the UK, including Greenland White-fronted Goose, Pink-footed Goose, Whooper Swan, Pintail, Teal, Wigeon, Knot, Dunlin and Black-tailed Godwit. Out of the 48 native species and populations featured in this publication, 32 reach internationally important numbers even on individual sites. Overall wintering waterbird numbers regularly exceed 20,000 birds on 47 sites; eight of which – The Wash, Ribble Estuary, Morecambe Bay, Dee estuary, North Norfolk Coast, Thames Estuary, Humber Estuary and Solway Estuary – exceed 100,000 birds.
It is important to note that many waterbirds are migratory, and so population changes and drivers of change are best considered across the whole flyway, not just in a UK context. Winter temperatures in Europe were on average milder than normal in 2024/25, following the pattern of recent years. Such mild conditions are known to affect waterbird migration patterns with short-stopping on migration contributing to the declines in the long-term trends for species such as Bewick’s Swan, Scaup and Coot, and could be contributing to increases in Black-tailed Godwit numbers as some juveniles winter in the UK instead of travelling to the Iberian peninsula. Short-staying and phenological change in migration timing can also affect index values, as the index is an average over several winter months. However, it must not be assumed that all observed declines would be caused by short-stopping, as many of the declines are caused by a population decline or a combination of the two causes.
As previously reported, HPAI was recorded causing major mortality in the winters of 2021/22 and 2022/23 among a number of waterbird species. The Svalbard Barnacle Goose on the Solway Estuary suffered badly in both years, and in 2022/23 and 2023/24 the Greenland Barnacle Goose also suffered significant mortality. Although HPAI continued to affect wildfowl in 2024/25, it was a less significant factor than in the previous few years. A study by Ross et al. (2024) on returning Solway geese in 2022/23 suggested partial immunity to avian influenza, possibly due to previous exposure. The strong recovery of the Svalbard Barnacle Goose population in 2023/24 may have been mediated by such immunity or be the result of density-dependent change in breeding success. Research work into goose serology is continuing with the aim to increase our understanding of the dynamics at play.
WeBS data provide necessary information on the status and trends of individual species as required by international agreements such as the Agreement on the Conservation of African Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds (AEWA). Assessment of migratory bird populations is important at a flyway scale, and January WeBS data are supplied to Wetlands International for inclusion in the International Waterbird Census. Summaries are used in waterbird population estimates, and in AEWA Conservation Status reports which inform the triennial update of AEWA species listings, which most recently occurred at the 8th meeting of the parties to the Agreement in 2021. A review of the conservation status was carried out as part of the 9th meeting. This Agreement has legal consequences for the UK, including the requirement that hunting of globally threatened species such as Pochard is sustainable. Data from WeBS was also used in the 7th UK National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity. At a country level, the data help countries in the UK to report on, implement or deliver country biodiversity strategies and biodiversity indicators. In addition, the data are widely used in local site management.
Confidence in results, quality assurance and caveats
WeBS volunteers follow standardised, peer-reviewed methods, and the submitted data undergo a combination of automated and manual validation and verification processes. These measures ensure that results derived from these data are scientifically robust. Trends are based on changes in smoothed population indices and are produced using Generalised Additive Models – this reduces the risk that short-term fluctuations obscure long-term trends. Missing values are accounted for using the Underhill indexing method (Underhill & Prys-Jones 1994). Although the statistical significance of trends is not currently assessed, the statistical approaches used to generate and compare indices are routinely used in peer-reviewed publications.
Trends are only published as part of the Official Statistic where they are considered statistically robust, and where the long-term trends in index values can be used to assess changes in overall wintering numbers with confidence. There are many reasons why this may not be the case, including low numbers present in the winter months and a species being either cryptic or secretive, resulting in low detection rates. Differential coverage of different habitats is a recognised potential bias, especially for those species where a substantial proportion of wintering birds occur away from the monitored sites (e.g. on farmland or on the open coast), or use the sites at times of the day when they are unlikely to be encountered by WeBS counters. Recording of gull and tern species is optional to WeBS counters, and so the data for them are considered incomplete. While only those trends considered robust enough to meet the stringent quality criteria set out in the Statistical Code are published as Official Statistics, all trends are available via WeBS Report Online.
GSMP aims at a complete population count of those geese where the species or population wholly or nearly wholly winters in the UK. As a result of the later timing of migration, the population count of Icelandic Greylag Goose includes individuals still residing in other countries at the time of the census. Including these birds in the count ensures a more complete population estimate and maintains comparability of the census data across the full time series.
There are slight differences in how the count data were processed for some of the goose species, which is reflected in the country trends for Pink-footed Goose in particular. These datasets are being scrutinised further with a view to making adjustments in future years where necessary to improve consistency.
Drivers of change
Changes in bird populations can be caused by a wide range of drivers, including climate/weather, breeding ground conditions, direct human-induced pressures such as habitat loss, human disturbance, and activities impacting water quality, and by conservation interventions such as protection afforded by the UK’s Special Protection Area network.
Climate/weather
Climate/weather impacts birds as it can affect food availability (e.g. frozen ground affects invertebrate availability), energy expenditure and survival rates. Climate/weather also influences migration routes and the timing of migration. Although species respond differently, the changing patterns of winter climate are contributing to changes in the timing and extent of migration by many species of waterbird, as birds move to milder areas to avoid freezing conditions. Analysis of this is best carried out within the context of longer-term species’ trends at the flyway level, and to this end, WeBS collaborates with other national monitoring schemes through the International Waterbird Census to provide such international contexts and encourage such analyses. The flyway population trends were published in 2021 in the 8th edition of the Conservation Status Report of the African-European Waterbird Agreement (AEWA). The 9th edition of the report published in late 2025 focuses on the pressures and drivers, with revised trends expected to be published in the 10th edition.
Breeding ground conditions
Most waterbirds that we see in the UK in the winter months are migratory, returning to the Arctic and Boreal zones (Greenland, Iceland, high Arctic Canada, Scandinavia, Russia) to breed in the summer. Population levels are influenced by breeding success which is influenced by conditions in their breeding grounds. Key factors influencing breeding ground conditions include climate/weather and predator-prey relations.
Direct human induced pressures
Other possible human-induced reasons for waterbird declines include changes in wetland management, deterioration in water quality, abstraction and drought causing falling water tables, and non-native predators such as Mink. A paper published in 2017 listed intensive agriculture, forestry, increases in generalist predator populations and climate change as possible factors negatively affecting the curlew during the breeding season (Franks et al. 2017), as can disturbance or loss of habitat that reduces the carrying capacity of the estuarine wintering habitat impact the over-wintering population (Woodward et al. 2021).
A potential site-specific pressure is coastal human disturbance; a recent study by Whittingham et al. (2019) found that offshore refuges appear to benefit Turnstone. Habitat loss in the form of loss of intertidal mudflats to land claim and various forms of erosion (Foster et al. 2013) and from impacts of the invasive plant species Spartina anglica (Borges et al. 2021), can also be factors. An example of site-specific pressure is development at busy estuaries, such as Southampton Water.
Conservation Interventions
The key UK sites – protected under various legislative measures – play a critical role in supporting waterbird populations under changing environmental conditions, and operate as a functional ecological network at national and international scales. The UK’s Special Protection Area network holds over one-third of the total UK over-wintering waterbird populations. Recent research by Gaget et al. (2021) suggests that conservation policy aimed at waterbirds and their habitats can help waterbird communities cope with climate warming.
Conservation action such as habitat management carried out on protected sites (as well as in other situations), has played a role in tempering population declines, or restoring or increasing some species population levels (Wauchope et al. 2022). For instance, the Pochard is notable in having less severe declines in SPAs, which may be due to site management in these areas (Caulfield et al. 2025).
Background and Methods
Wintering waterfowl have been surveyed since 1947. The first national counts were carried out in the winter of 1951/52 and included 500 sites. Today, over 220 waterbird (wildfowl, waders, rails, divers, grebes, cormorants and herons) species, races or populations are recorded every year by the Wetland Bird Survey (WeBS), and trends are produced for the most numerous 110 of these.
The Goose and Swan Monitoring Programme (GSMP) monitors the abundance and breeding success of the UK’s native geese and migratory swans during the non-breeding season. GSMP data are used to produce trends for Icelandic Greylag Goose, Pink-footed Goose, Svalbard Barnacle Goose, Greenland Barnacle Goose, Taiga Bean Goose and Greenland White-fronted Goose.
The objectives of waterbird monitoring are to assess the size of non-breeding waterbird populations, trends in their numbers and distribution, and the importance of individual sites for waterbirds.
The annual WeBS and GSMP report Waterbirds in the UK presents syntheses of the data, and provides a single, comprehensive source of information on waterbird status and distribution in the UK.
Data collection and method overview
The wintering waterbird statistics are comprised of data from two survey components: WeBS core counts and GSMP goose counts.
WeBS core counts: Monthly counts (year-round, but with an emphasis on winter months) of all waterbirds are carried out on coastal and inland wetland sites. The WeBS waterbird counts are made using a so-called “look-see” method (Bibby et al. 2000) where the observer, familiar with the species involved, surveys the whole pre-defined area, and records the numbers of each species of waterbird present. The counts include all waterbird species, including non-natives and escapes, but recording of gulls is optional. Smaller sites are counted as one unit, while larger sites are divided into sectors with sector counts pooled to give the site totals. The same sites and sectors are revisited each survey. Counters are encouraged to do the WeBS counts on pre-determined weekends each month, although weather conditions and counter availability can result in different days being chosen. Synchronising the sector counts within a site is particularly important. Coastal sites are counted at high tide, with a small number at other states of the tide because of site-specific practical considerations.
GSMP goose counts: A number of native migratory goose populations are surveyed by the Goose and Swan Monitoring Programme. Co-ordinated counts are carried out, usually timed to coincide with each species’ peak populations on sites of known concentrations of birds. Goose count data are used to produce the trends for Icelandic Greylag Goose, Pink-footed Goose, Svalbard Barnacle Goose, Greenland Barnacle Goose, Taiga Bean Goose and Greenland White-fronted Goose.
Sample site selection
WeBS Core Counts: WeBS core counts are carried out on pre-determined coastal and inland sites across the UK. This site network is designed to cover the majority of sites where large aggregations of waterbirds are regularly found. Sites include all wetland habitats used by waterbirds – freshwater lakes, ponds, reservoirs, gravel pits, rivers, canals, freshwater marshes as well as open coast and estuaries. The latter habitat provides the majority of data for all the species that tend to congregate in key estuaries over the winter. Sites that are not being counted are advertised to WeBS counters on a vacant sites map, from which new and existing counters can select a site of their choice. The counters are encouraged to choose sites where obtaining data is particularly important, including on SSSIs and SPAs where wintering waterbirds are a feature.
GSMP goose counts: Since wintering geese tend to concentrate at specific locations, both on and off wetland sites, GSMP goose counts are carried out on sites with known concentrations of geese with the aim to arrive at as complete a count for the species or population as possible.
Data submission
The primary method for capturing waterbird data from both schemes is through an online capture system by surveyors themselves or by surveyor co-ordinators, although some data are submitted to BTO via paper forms or spreadsheets to be added to the dataset.
Data validation and verification
The online database is programmed to automatically carry out validation and verification processes of the inputted data. It attaches standardised species nomenclature to the data and carries out automated data integrity checks that ensure that all mandatory information is captured with valid date and time information and accurate geographic location information. Any particularly unusual counts are flagged, checked by the Local Organisers or National Organisers and confirmed with the counters if necessary.
Data analysis
WeBS core counts provide the information used in assessing population trends for most species wintering in the UK. Annual and monthly indices are produced for each species. There are occasions when counters miss one or two months during the season, and so an imputing process is used to derive these missing counts and to make the data comparable from one year to the next. Counts can also be marked incomplete by counters where the count is considered to be a minimum estimate due to visibility, disturbance or inaccessibility of some of the count area, meaning it is possible some birds were missed. At complex sites containing multiple count sectors, some of which may not have been visited, completeness for the entire site is calculated on a species-by-species basis using historical data of bird distribution within the site. The Underhill Index (Underhill and Prys-Jones 1994) was specifically developed to analyse the waterbird population counts to produce a time series of index values for each species or subpopulation. This method includes a calculation to estimate counts for missing and incomplete site-month combinations, based on counts in other months and all sites, hence making counts comparable across years.
Monthly indices reveal the patterns of seasonality for the species concerned. The annual index values are calculated from the average of counts carried out between November and March for waders (for which high numbers of passage birds need to be separated from wintering birds) and between September and March for other species. The index for the resident British/Irish Greylag Goose is based on data from April to September in order to separate them from the migratory Icelandic Greylag Geese in parts of their range where the two populations overlap. These are then fed into General Additive Models (GAMs) to produce smoothed indices and trends which are especially useful when assessing changes through time.
The 25-year and 10-year population trends are calculated by comparing the smoothed index value for the last but one year in the data series and the 25 and 10 years previous to that year. It is customary to truncate the final year when reporting smoothed trends, so whilst data from 2024/25 have been used in creating the smoothed index values, the trend period assessed and reported is until 2023/24.
Index values for 2020/21 are not available due to data limitations related to COVID-19 restrictions (Frost & Calbrade 2022).
More information on the survey protocols, analysis and results can be found on the scheme websites for Wetland Bird Survey and Goose and Swan Monitoring Programme.
Technical details of the WeBS method are set out in a separate document available on the BTO website.
Value of citizen science approach
Over 4,100 WeBS volunteer counters contributed to the survey in 2024/25, making around 44,700 count visits to over 5,900 sectors on over 3,400 sites (mostly estuaries and large still waters). GSMP surveys cover around 100 further sites. This ‘citizen science’ approach, with an estimated value of over £2.5 million per year (using a day rate of £150 a day for the majority of volunteers and £350 a day for ‘Local Organisers’), enables very broad simultaneous sampling coverage that would not be possible using professional surveyors only, and it provides an opportunity for volunteers to engage with nature in an active outdoor interest as they take part in a national conservation/monitoring project.
Involvement and contacts
This statistic was produced by the Wetland Bird Survey partnership, with BTO having primary responsibility for producing the statistic.
Quality Assurance was carried out by BTO, JNCC, RSPB and NatureScot. Additional information on quality assurance and WeBS methods is provided in the Methods section.
The population trends are published as a JNCC Official Statistic. If you have any queries, please contact us.
WeBS is a partnership between the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO), Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) and the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC), with fieldwork conducted by volunteers.
GSMP is a partnership between the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO), the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) and NatureScot, with fieldwork conducted by volunteer and professional surveyors.
Relation to other Official and National Statistics, and broader relevance
This statistic forms part of a suite of statistics produced through partnership monitoring schemes as part of JNCC’s broader evidence provision.
The statistic feeds into the National Statistics Compendium – UK Biodiversity Indicators – and country-level indicators (e.g. for Scotland and for England).
Data from WeBS are used in scientific research and to inform conservation action.
References
Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A. and Mustoe, S. (2000). Bird Census Techniques. Second Edition. Academic Press, London.
Borges, F.O., Santos, C.P., Paula, J.R., Mateos-Naranjo, E., Redondo-Gomez, S., Adams, J.B., Caçador, I., Fonseca, V.F., Reis-Santos, P., Duarte, B. and Rosa, R. (2021). Invasion and extirpation potential of native and invasive Spartina species under climate change. Frontiers in Marine Science, 8, p.696333.
Caulfield, E.B., Feather, A., Smith, J.A., Frost, T.M. & Woodward, I.D. (2025). Wetland Bird Survey Alerts 2021/2022: Changes in numbers of wintering waterbirds in the Constituent Countries of the United Kingdom, Special Protection Areas (SPAs), Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs) and Areas of Special Scientific interest (ASSIs). BTO Research Report 786. BTO, Thetford. www.bto.org/webs-reporting-alerts
Foster, N.M., Hudson, M.D., Bray, S. & Nicholls, R.J. (2013). Intertidal mudflat and saltmarsh conservation and sustainable use in the UK: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 126, 96-104.
Franks, S.E., Douglas, D.J.T., Gillings, S. & Pearce-Higgins, J.W. (2017). Environmental correlates of breeding abundance and population change of Eurasian Curlew Numenius arquata in Britain. Bird Study, 64, 393–409.
Frost, T.M. & Calbrade, N.A. (eds.). (2022). Wetland Bird Survey News 2020/21 Special Edition. BTO, RSPB and JNCC. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford
Gaget E. & Frost T. et al (2021). Protected area characteristics that help waterbirds respond to climate warming. Conservation Biology. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13877.
Ross, C.S., Byrne, A.M.P., Mahmood, S., Thomas, S., Reid, S., Freath, L., Griffin, L.R., Falchieri, M., Holmes, P., Goldsmith, N., Shaw, J.M., MacGugan, A., Aegerter, J., Hansen, R., Brown, I.H. & Banyard, A.C. (2024) Genetic Analysis of H5N1 High-Pathogenicity Avian Influenza Virus following a Mass Mortality Event in Wild Geese on the Solway Firth. Pathogens, 13(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13010083
Underhill, L.G. & Prŷs-Jones, R. (1994) Index numbers for waterbird populations. I. Review and methodology. Journal of Applied Ecology, 31, 463–480.
Wauchope, H.S., Jones, J.P.G., Geldmann, J.et al. (2022). Protected areas have a mixed impact on waterbirds, but management helps. Nature, 605, 103–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04617-0
Whittingham, M.J., McKenzie, A.J., Francksen, R.M., Feige, D., Cadwallender, T., Grainger, M., Fazaa, N., Rhymer, C., Wilkinson, C., Lloyd, P., Smurthwaite, B., Percival, S.M., Morris-Hale, T., Rawcliffe, C., Dewson, C., Woods, S., Stewart, G.B., Oughton, E. (2019). Offshore refuges support higher densities and show slower population declines of wintering Ruddy Turnstones Arenaria interpres. Bird Study, 66, 431–440.
Woodward, I.D., Austin, G.E., Boersch-Supan, P.H., Thaxter, C.B. & Burton, N.H.K. (2021). Assessing drivers of winter abundance change in Eurasian Curlews Numenius arquata in England and Wales. Bird Study, 68(3), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2022.2049205
Published:
